Timeline for Are driving questions on-topic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2011 at 16:32 | comment | added | Theodor | Ok, while I still think it is a valid enough reason, the "Yes." might trigger alarms to people thinking I'm pro questions like "How do I drift?". I am not. But again I do see your point. @Michael - I'll try to stay strong ;) @Iszy - Yes I agree, the questions should be relavent and answerable in an objective manner first of all. | |
| Mar 8, 2011 at 16:31 | comment | added | PearsonArtPhoto | If we allowed such questions, the answer would be to change the site to just be about automobiles, repair, maintenance, and driving. But let's see how this site progresses for now, we can always vote to increase the site's scope later. | |
| Mar 8, 2011 at 16:12 | comment | added | Iszi | @Theodor - While I agree that some driving questions are relevant here, and cannot disagree with your prediction, your stated reason is not enough on its own to be a good one for including all driving questions here. | |
| Mar 7, 2011 at 23:23 | comment | added | Michael Pryor | Also note that downvotes on meta sites are not a 'bad' thing. They just signal disagreement (so don't feel bad that you got a bunch of downvotes :) | |
| Mar 7, 2011 at 22:57 | comment | added | Rebecca Chernoff | because it doesn't fit elsewhere is not a good reason for inclusion here. | |
| Mar 7, 2011 at 22:52 | comment | added | BG100 | @Theodor: Sorry, but I disagree. This website is called Motor Vechicle Maintenance and Repair, not Motor Vechicle Driving. We should stick to that. | |
| Mar 7, 2011 at 22:36 | history | answered | Theodor | CC BY-SA 2.5 |