4

We have , , and . I'm wondering if it would make sense to have a standard form of engine nomenclature, perhaps just 'type' rather than 'type-engine' (e.g., 'radial' vs. 'radial-engine')?

2
  • 2
    Although radial could be confusing, as that could also apply to tires as well.
    – Cullub
    Jul 15, 2016 at 17:07
  • 1
    Clarity of meaning is more important than consistency Jul 19, 2016 at 16:44

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .